Title
Direct and indirect impacts of synthetic biology on biodiversity conservation
Author(s)
Macfarlane, Nicholas B.W.; Adams, Jonathan; Bennett, Elizabeth L.; Brooks, Thomas M.; Delborne, Jason A.; Eggermont, Hilde; Endy, Drew; Esvelt, Kevin M.; Kolodziejczyk, Bartlomiej; Kuiken, Todd; Oliva, Maria Julia; Peña Moreno, Sonia; Slobodian, Lydia; Smith, Risa B.; Thizy, Delphine; Tompkins, Daniel M.; Wei, Wei; Redford, Kent H.
Published
2022
Publisher
iScience
Abstract
The world’s biodiversity is in crisis. Synthetic biology has the potential to transform biodiversity conservation, both directly and indirectly, in ways that are negative and positive. However, applying these biotechnology tools to environmental questions is fraught with uncertainty and could harm cultures, rights, livelihoods, and nature. Decisions about whether or not to use synthetic biology for conservation should be understood alongside the reality of ongoing biodiversity loss. In 2022, the 196 Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity are negotiating the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework that will guide action by governments and other stakeholders for the next decade to conserve the worlds’ biodiversity. To date, synthetic biologists, conservationists, and policy makers have operated in isolation. At this critical time, this review brings these diverse perspectives together and emerges out of the need for a balanced and inclusive examination of the potential application of these technologies to biodiversity conservation.
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.
![]()
Back
PUB35884