NSIP

Resources

Title
How to prioritize species recovery after a megafire
Author(s)
Ward, Michelle; Carwardine, Josie; Watson, James E.M.; Pintor, Anna; Stuart, Stephanie; Possingham, Hugh P.; Rhodes, Jonathan R.; Carey, Alexander R.; Auerbach, Nancy; Reside, April; Yong, Chuan Ji; Tulloch, Ayesha
Published
2022
Publisher
Conservation Biology
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13936
Abstract
Due to climate change, megafires are increasingly common, and have sudden, extensive impacts on many species over vast areas, leaving decision-makers uncertain about how best to prioritize recovery. Here, we provide a decision-support framework to prioritize conservation actions to improve species outcomes immediately after a megafire. The framework selects complementary locations to extend actions across all impacted species' habitats. We then assess the conservation advantages of this approach by comparing it to a site-richness approach (i.e., identifying areas that can cost-effectively recover the most species in any one location). Using the 2019-2020 Australian megafires as a case study, we show that 290 threatened species have likely been severely impacted and likely require immediate conservation action to ensure their survival. Our framework identified 179 subregions, found mostly in south-east Australia, as key locations to extend actions that benefit multiple species. We compare our complementarity-based prioritization with a conventional site-richness approach and demonstrate cost savings of more than AUD$300 million to reduce 95% of threats across all species. In addition to cost efficiencies, our complementarity-based prioritization spreads post-fire management actions across a wider proportion of the study area compared with site richness (43% versus 37% of the landscape managed, respectively), and ensures more of each species' range is managed (average 90% versus 79% of every species' habitat managed). In addition to wildfire response, our complementarity-based management allocation framework can be used to prioritize conservation actions that will best mitigate threats impacting species following other environmental disasters like floods and drought, all of which are likely to increase in intensity and frequency under future climate change.
Keywords
Fire; Australia; Bushfire impacts; actions; conservation; climate change

Access Full Text

A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.




Back

PUB27520